Well I finally got to see the movie, “Milk” last night. It was with an eclectic group of straight and gay, Christian and not. And after the movie we had some good conversation together.
For those of you not familiar with the movie, the basic story is that of Harvey Milk the first openly gay individual to be elected to public office as Supervisor in the Castro district of San Francisco in the late 1970’s. The context in which Harvey pursued a place in public office was the repeal of anti-discrimination laws on the basis of sexual orientation. In particular, these efforts were publicly endorsed and advanced by evangelical Christian Anita Bryant among others.
I had many conflicting emotions as I watched the film.
I could not help but lament the reminder of the toxic combination of fear and power – and the past and present demonstrations of how Christians capitulate to these drivers and motivators.
I could not help but feel deep concern and outrage for the replay of the kinds of events and experiences in Milk’s time with the current events in places like Uganda.
Fear is too dominant.
Playing on stereotypes and assumptions and mischaracterizations sadly continues.
Demanding with a sense of righteous entitlement to have it ‘your way’ has not given way to humility.
I’ll never be a politician. I’m not an activist. I know the issues are complex ~ and I don’t pretend to offer simplistic answers to the dilemmas of power in a pluralistic context.
But I do see the example of Jesus. I do see the Lord of the Universe empty himself, take the role of a servant, choose love over fear, and promote justice.
Regardless of what you believe theologically about homosexual behaviour, we should imitate Christ’s example as we engage a film like “Milk”, as we consider today’s propositions and legislative issues, and as we look at global justice for glbtq people.
Humble ourselves. Serve. Choose love over fear. And promote justice.
Harvey Milk was an imperfect man. But as Dianne Feinstein has said, "His homosexuality gave him an insight into the scars which all oppressed people wear. He believed that no sacrifice was too great a price to pay for the cause of human rights.”
One poignant line for me in the movie was when Harvey passionately corrects a political colleague and says, “It’s more than an issue – it’s our lives we’re fighting for.” Harvey, it seemed, tried to focus on the real lives of people – including and especially his constituents who were gay. It seems he remembered that this is primarily about people not just power.
Might those who name the name of Jesus remember this too.
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
thanks for the post and everything you're doing Wendy!
added your blog to my reader today . . . looking forward to what you have to say!
rich
thanks for stopping by rich - it'd be great to have your voice in some of the conversations that spring up here at btg.....
I find it interesting that you mention "Harvey Milk was an imperfect man". I wonder if any glbt viewers would agree with that statement and why. A few months ago the California state assembly passed a bill to designate an annual "Harvey Milk Day"-- upon which Calif. public schools would be encouraged to hold some sort of commemoration of Harvey. It was vetoed by Gov. Schwarzenegger. This disappointed me and I wondered: Would a gay man, as compared to a straight man, have to be "perfect" in order to offer a valuable lesson to California kids?
Hi Denise,
The context for my comment was the knowledge that some people would be uncomfortable / disagree with certain choices and decisions of Milk as portrayed by the movie - in particular related to drug use and sexual activity. I don't think his choices in those areas should overshadow Milk's commitment to truly see the real lives of people and his work for human rights - regardless of whether you agree with all of his choices or not. That was the context for my comment. If Milk had been straight the comment would have applied the same.
Some people (often Christians) get so offended by an individual's behavioural choices that it completely blinds them to the other valuable contributions that the individual may have made. This is, I believe, unfortunate and prevents us from seeing our common and imperfect shared humanity.
Denise: Speaking only for myself as a gay man, I would tend to agree with the view that Harvey Milk was an imperfect man. I'll be honest that I haven't seen the movie nor have I studied in-depth about the man's life, so I can't point to anything in particular and say "this is why I consider him imperfect." I simply believe that no person is perfect, and that we all have our fair share of what I'd call "personal warts."
But then, I'll also note that imperfection is not a big deal for me. In fact, I'll go so far as to say that I think that "perfection" is overvalued by far too many people in our society these days. I'm not looking to be perfect, nor do I expect or desire perfection from others. Continuing attempts at self-improvement, yes. But not perfection.
Some people (often Christians) get so offended by an individual's behavioural choices that it completely blinds them to the other valuable contributions that the individual may have made.Wendy: Personally, I see an even bigger issue here. A person's inherent dignity and worth are based on neither people's behavioural choices nor the valuable contributions they have made. A person's basic dignity and worth is based simply on the fact that they exist.
Too often, I think that reality is forgotten in our society. There's this constant belief that we have to push to do something or meet some sort of standard to earn a sense of value and worth. I find that tendency to be troubling at best. And while I'm generally not inclined to make such proclamations as a non-Christian, I also tend to think that world-view is antithetical and anathema to the gospel of Christ -- at least the one I've heard in the past.
-- Jarred.
Hi Jarred,
I agree that the bedrock foundation of seeing each human being as inherently having worth and value is not based on what they do. That is a value I hope we embody consistently on this blog.
In particular, however, I think it is easy to disregard someone's valuable contributions to our common and shared humanity because you don't like something they believe or do. But just because you may disagree with something they believe or do - doesn't mean that the good that they do is meaningless. That's all I was trying to get at with that comment.
When we talk about bridging the gap, if those with conservative perspectives on sexuality could acknowledge the good contributions that have been made by gay people in our society, that would be a good step in the right direction.
Ironically, Christians often raise this cry when they express dismay that people are so cynical about the church "but don't they see all the good we do in our communities" .... the question is, are they willing to see the good other communities are also contributing?
Post a Comment